From: Alex Heney 
Newsgroups: uk.finance uk.legal
Subject: Re: Don't bank with the COOP because they are either incompetant or crooked
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:29:39 +0100
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PISJexI4cnbKdgm3ZJLw4t0AEBI=
Bytes: 3081

On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:56:21 GMT, "JethroUK"  wrote:

>
>"Alex Heney"  wrote in message 
>news:2pe0g3p6u2a85hbu9qo2m8f8gqt3su582e@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:43:54 GMT, "JethroUK"  wrote:
>>
>>>
>
>>
>> And again, if you think otherwise, where exactly do you draw the line?
>
>It's not unclear - only your theory is
>

So you will be able to answer the question then.

>> Remember that the remedies stipulated by SOGA are *always* remedies
>> for breach of contract. So how major does the breach have to be before
>> you think a full refund is an *entitlement* even after acceptance?
>
>I cannot beleive I need to hammer this in - companies are not at liberty to 
>lie/cheat about products - obviously! - Their lying and cheating maynot be 
>immediately apparent
>

Nobody has ever suggested otherwise.


>It may need an expert to define whether it is 'as described', so no one will 
>ever be in a position to verify it or 'accept' it
>
>Just to see how far you are off your trolley:
>
>How do you verify say, a CD-RW that claims to be able to write 100 times 
>("twice" as good as a write 50 times disc) - and this 'benefit' is reflected 
>in the price (it's twice the cost) - You can't verify it! - You buy one - 
>'accepted' - it only writes 10 times - Trades descripton protects just such 
>situations & gives you 'a full refund' = makes you whole again
>

You tell me.


>Now lets hear your bollocks version
>

What "bollocks version" might that be then?
-- 
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Almost went crazy. Would have been a real short trip.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom