From:  "Theo_Delight@yahoo.co.uk" 
Newsgroups: uk.finance uk.legal
Subject: Re: Alex Heney S.O.G.A. 'acceptance' theory anyone????
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 07:46:13 -0700
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0
Bytes: 1935

On 1 Oct, 15:01, Peter Parry  wrote:
> The retailer can chose to replace the hammer with another of the same
> specification (we can assume repair isn't an option).  If he has none
> in stock he can offer a refund which in this case would be for the
> full cost as a hammer has a working life of decades and you had had
> it for an insignificant fraction of that time.  It is the retailer,
> though, not the buyer, who chooses whether to replace or refund.

But a repair should be perfectly easy, unless the kipper has a
fibreglass shaft.

--
 x    If you have been did you have hammers for tea?
/|\