From: "JethroUK" 
Newsgroups: uk.finance uk.legal
Subject: Re: Don't bank with the COOP because they are either incompetant or crooked
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:43:54 GMT
Bytes: 3473


"Alex Heney"  wrote in message 
news:jctvf31rhn24ced6t93r4ngd7g71lb72m3@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:53:42 GMT, "JethroUK"  wrote:
>
>>
>>"Alex Heney"  wrote in message
>>news:tkctf31gip13datbb0jqmv2qmq8ic3lvfi@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:16:36 GMT, "JethroUK"  wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Alex Heney"  wrote in message
>>>>news:bb5rf35na54mhci79ud1cpcaac9i4s8l3u@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:31:10 GMT, "JethroUK"  wrote:
>>>>>

>>So you 'are' suggesting that 'but for the fact' that i recognise it as a
>>kipper and not a hammer - they can sell me a frozen kipper, as a hammer 
>>and
>>the only protection i legally have (under SOGA) is to recognise that it is 
>>a
>>kipper and so not 'accept' it?
>
> No, I am not suggesting that for one moment.
>
> there is plenty of protection under SOGA for goods which do not
> conform to contract.
>
> What I AM suggesting is that the protection does not extend as far as
> a FULL refund once you have accepted the goods.
>

Listen carefully

I *have* accepted the frozen kipper

I was just sold to me as 'a hammer' - i used it as 'a hammer' - it only 
lasted 3 days 'hammering'

Just to get this clear - Are you 'suggesting' I am not entitled to a full 
refund - just because i didn't recognise it was not the hammer described?

If so - not only do you not know the law - you are clearly insane