From: "Tim" 
Newsgroups: uk.legal uk.finance
Subject: Re: Credit card refund?
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:32:40 +0100
Bytes: 2813

>>"Mike_B" wrote
>>> And in the case being discussed, ... "This is a
>>> dispute over a transaction for less than £100, ...".
>>
> "Tim" wrote
>>Ah, there is your mistake.  We are talking about
>>a transaction *over* £100, as can easily be
>>seen from Mark's post starting this sub-thread :-
>>
>>"Mark" wrote at 14:20 on 31/08/2007 in message
>>news:9a5gd31jup5f606p7csd0k0r6abc50tr4b@4ax.com
>>> And some refuse to help even above this level.  I know the relevant
>>> part of the consumer credit act but they, apparently, do not.
>>
> "Tim" wrote
>>Notice where he says "even above this level" ?
>
"Mike_B" wrote
> Yes.. Its always dangerous around here to remember
> and discuss the original topic as somebody is bound
> to get bored and change the subject after 2 or 3 posts.

Had you already changed the subject (without telling
anyone!) when you said the following to me? :-


"Mike_B" wrote
> It is still relatively rare for a credit cad company to sue
> for non payment. They prefer to ruin a persons credit ...