From: "JethroUK" 
Newsgroups: uk.finance uk.legal
Subject: Re: Alex Heney S.O.G.A. 'acceptance' theory anyone????
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:57:49 GMT
Bytes: 3063


"Joe Lee"  wrote in message 
news:4701c509$0$8412$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
>
> "Willy"  wrote in message 
> news:1191227850.859240.129840@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>> On 1 Oct, 00:22, "JethroUK"  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I want a hammer, the box says "Hammer", the man in the shop says 
>>> 'hammer -
>>> it's for knocking nails in' - inside the box is actually a frozen 
>>> kipper -
>>> but lets assume i don't know any better and I buy it on face value
>>>
>>> Is there a single person in uk.legal that supports his fairy story?
>>>
>>
>> sounds a bit fishy to me
>
> Now look, you might think it's funny, but this is a serious discussion. 
> There is no precedent for determining the difference between a hammer & a 
> frozen kipper & as such we are entering into unchartered legal waters.
>
> So this is not the time or plaice for fishy puns. We really need to knock 
> it on the head & nail this matter down.
>
> Personally I think that introducing a pun will be seen as nothing more 
> than a red herring - or possibly a brown & somewhat smoked herring.
>
> IMO the rotten fish is not fit for porpoise, & the OP should file a clam & 
> hammer it out at a full herring in front of a District Rudge.
>

I certainly in-tench to do that - the bloke is giving my a haddock and it is 
worthy of a caught herring

Personally - I think he is talking a load of pollocks - And most definately 
in bream of the newsgroup cod of conduct