From: dim@soda.csua.berkeley.edu (D. Gerasimatos)
Newsgroups: misc.consumers.house
Subject: Re: Who's responsible for hail damage occurring between inspection and closing?
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 11:30:04 -0700 (PDT)

In article <1158422357.386735.109170@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
  wrote:
>To win in court the buyers need to PROVE two things:
>  1. There is in fact serious hail damage that occured after (not
>before) their inspection. If damage occurred prior to inspection the
>buyer needs to go after inspector.
>  2. That the sellers knew of said hail damage and did n ot repair
>and/or disclose such damage.
>  Without those two things, buyer is just wasting time.


This is absolutely true.


>They should have made a closer inspection at walkthrough.  Thats what a 
>judge will say. AS-IS means just that.


I disagree with this. The statements above are sufficient. These
statements down here don't necessarily follow.


Dimitri