From: "Kevin Singleton"
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps misc.consumers.house alt.home.repair sci.environment
Subject: Re: Kerry should work at IHOP. not run for president
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:57:45 -0400
"Ian St. John" wrote in message
news:sB0bd.31607$3C6.1146668@news20.bellglobal.com...
> Please remove your head from your anus. It may be difficult, but it is
> worth
> it in the end.
>
Ah. Abuse. You've run out of "facts", have you?
> No U.S. resolutions were violated. Nor does the U.S. have jurisdiction
> outside of its own boundaries. Please learn something about the
> constitution.
>
I'm getting Constitutional preaching from a Canook! Hilarious! Hostilities
in the original Gulf War ended in a UN-brokered cease-fire. The war had not
ended. Hussein had not complied with the terms of the cease-fire, so we
kicked his puny ass. The US has jurisdiction anywhere there exists a
perceived threat to the security of the US. Heck, we'll even defend Canada,
too!
> The U.S. provided troops TO the U.N. in Gulf 1 which also passed a
> resolution authorising force in removing Iraq from Kuwait. That is all. It
> has nothing to do with Gulf 2 which had no support from the U.N. and was
> illegal not only under U.S. law which did not authorise 'pre-emptive
> strikes' without cause, but also under U.S law by way of the U.N
> membership
> which means the U.N. charter that specifically denies the right to invade
> except in response to an invasion or under Security Council authority
> which
> they could not get despite many attempts.
>
Not true. See above. The original Gulf War never ended, and the US
reserves the right to pre-emptively strike anywhere the US perceives a
threat to US security. That's what "Super Power" means, eh?
> So that is where you get your propaganda? No wonder you are so delusional.
>
I only read Canadian newspapers, eh?
> No. They were not. And the U.N. has consistently stated that so
> interpretation of their resolutions authorised any invasion of Iraq such
> as
> the no fly zones. All countries participating were doing so illegally.
>
You are simply wrong.
> delusions>
>
I'm convinced that you wouldn't recognize a fact if it squirted out of your
back bacon.
--
Kevin
-=#=-
www.freerepublic.com
|