Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:28:41 -0600
From: "Elle" 
Newsgroups: misc.invest.financial-plan
Subject: Re: American Funds
	iQBVAwUARA8USfl/I4+O31e5AQGc5wH+PPs3M84h96vQW5DlYkBtTAbmqX02eGz1
	H4ZIobqVR9VXFZF/I8CoWXkAgvnIBRoFln4W7rbpCmAlYBzc93wd9A==
	=f8gi

 wrote
> "Elle"  writes:
>> "John Radgosky"  wrote
>> > Front loads almost ALWAYS work out for the better 
>> > interest
>> > of the
>> > client in the long run.
>>
>> Numerous, reputable studies demonstrate how the 
>> performance
>> of loaded funds or results from higher sales fees, as a
>> statistical matter and with reference to a time period of
>> say ten years, is not superior to the performance of
>> non-loaded funds or the results from lower sales fees.
>
> He's right - if you are comparing front loads to other
> forms of loads on the same funds.

Shouldn't the "if" above be emphasized?

I can't tell if what you are saying is what John Radgosky 
intended. From the context of his and my exchange, it sure 
does not seem like it.

If it is what John intended, then he and I were not on the 
same page to begin with.