Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 03:58:37 CST
From: paulmaf@aol.com (PaulMaf)
Newsgroups: misc.invest.financial-plan
Subject: Re: to commingle or not to commingle
	iQBVAwUAP7SnTfl/I4+O31e5AQEEpAIA1ose+i5qMYW9XbLHgJbau+ZMRthITTcR
	GGTArrU4acdVky5L7WVlfITeLcuk4cAan4EYSmN5O3DUzBS102apWg==
	=BUzk
	tests=BAYES_01,REFERENCES
	autolearn=ham version=2.53

>From: BreadWithSpam@fractious.net
>Date: 11/13/03 9:59 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: 

>"not really needed"?  It was never really needed.  It's just
>that keeping it separate keeps certain options open to you
>in the future - in particular, the ability to roll it back
>into another employer's plan in the future.

There is no need to do so today. The rules changed.

>If you are positive that you'll have no interest in ever
>rolling it back into an employer's plan, go ahead and
>comingle.

This is immaterial today, He can comingle and still roll it into an employer's
401K at a later date.